2009-01-26 Conference Call
Logistics
Time: Jan 26 2009, 10:30am
Conference Bridge: 218-486-7200 #167964
Attendees
@ScottS
@Benn Oshrin
@Jonathan Markow
@Eric Pierce
Absent
@David L. Whitehurst
@Troy Bull
Agenda
Review old Action Items
Review and approve RFC Process
Review and approve takeover of CAS protocol management
determine who updates protocol document
Review locating CAS3 maintainer while CAS4 development continues
Feb/Mar calls vs Jasig Conference
More Formal Strategy (i.e. uPortal)
Notes
There will be no more Community Calls until after the Dallas conference
Too many roadmap pages?
CAS Vision and Roadmap should reflect what isn't committed to
CAS 4 Roadmap is JIRA extract
Having trouble finding leads for service management and monitoring subgroups
Discussion of Howard's comment: We'll put a permanent link somewhere
Contrib is independent of process
Developers review contrib
It's contrib unless someone starts the RFC
RFC review could result in "it's contrib"
Andy Newman was ok with CAS SC taking ownership of existing CAS protocol management, and SC voted its approval
SC has final responsibility for protocol document, but updates to it could be delegated
February call will be replaced with Dallas conference meeting (and call in)
March call TBD
We should have a high level vision statement for CAS (similar to uPortal)
Where does CAS fit in, especially with I2 middleware?
Future direction/roadmap
CAS "info sheet"
Positioning statement, vs I2 middleware, Sun, Oracle, etc
Action Items
Benn: Update RFC Process for Howard's comments
Scott: Write definitions for contrib, give to Benn to review against Incubation terminology (see also AI from January 2009 Conference Call
Scott: Poke around to see if anyone is interested in the subgroup lead positions, and/or in maintaining CAS 3.x
All: Discuss high level vision at Dallas
Carryover
Scott: Roadmap cleanup & updates, including
Add to JIRA
Add a column to the roadmap indicating who has committed to doing what
Sort roadmap items into the groups identified in the agenda and find leads for each
New Working Groups: Begin requirements gathering and prioritize decision
?: Propose clear text password feature as test of new development process