[10:48:49 CST(-0600)] <js70> ant initportal is failing. following error:
[10:48:50 CST(-0600)] <js70> org.springframework.dao.DataIntegrityViolationException: Batch entry 0 insert into UP_PERMISSION_OWNER (OWNER_DESCRIPTION, ENTITY_VERSION, OWNER_FNAME, OWNER_NAME, OWNER_ID) values (NULL, '0', 'SSP', 'Student Success Plan', '10') was aborted. Call getNextException to see the cause.; SQL [n/a]; constraint [null]; nested exception is org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException: Batch entry 0 insert into UP_PERMISSION_OWNER (OWNER_DESCRI
[10:53:06 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> hmmm. will try over here....
[11:04:48 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> getting a different error at the moment...
[11:12:23 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> hmmm
[11:12:25 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> works for me
[11:12:37 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> let me try nuking the db once more and trying again
[11:16:34 CST(-0600)] <js70> i have a number of coaches that I add for testing. do i need to change their user.xml
[11:16:36 CST(-0600)] <js70> ?
[11:34:30 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> shouldnt have to, but was going to ask if you had anything custom/local in ssp_entities
[11:35:59 CST(-0600)] <js70> I do have 100+ additional coaches. I rolled back so I only have the original and it is working now.
[11:36:09 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> alright. totally clean db. totally clean ssp_entities. running… 'ant -Dmaven.test.skip=true clean initportal'
[11:36:14 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> k
[11:36:49 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> not sure why just having custom user records would cause this to blow up
[11:37:27 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> user records can declare arbitrary attribute values, but those don't have anything to do with that UP_PERMISSION_OWNER stmt that bombed out
[12:08:06 CST(-0600)] <js70> k
[12:08:41 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> (that latest initportal of mine succeeded, fwiw)
[12:09:47 CST(-0600)] <js70> yeah, mine did as well. I pulled back on the datasets I was trying to use. there may be something there. don't know.
[14:51:56 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> Archna needs some test data for Early Alerts to work on a jira issue. Does anybody have/know of an easy way to load data? Creating them in SSP-Platform should work in this situation, but she doesn't have any sample external data and the SSP-platform won't build and deploy for her. I spent some time last week but couldn't figure out the problem.
[15:05:01 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> um… three options… 1) liquibase, 2) chrome/FF extension for generating REST requests, 3) curl
[15:07:12 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> for an example of #1, see ./src/test/resources/org/jasig/ssp/database/changesets/000008-test.xml
[15:07:22 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> the "test early_alert data" changeset
[15:15:39 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> the other two are much more involved, relatively speaking. can dig up examples if #1 doesn't work.
[15:52:32 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> TonyUnicon you've not started on SSP-696, right?
[15:53:11 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> i'm grabbing it to work on for the next… 7 minutes 
[15:53:29 CST(-0600)] <TonyUnicon> let me bring up the ticket
[15:53:38 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> at which time i switch again from software to slideware
[15:54:12 CST(-0600)] <TonyUnicon> no
[15:54:18 CST(-0600)] <TonyUnicon> i haven't started on it yet
[15:54:25 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> grabbing it
[15:58:23 CST(-0600)] <TonyUnicon> thank you sir
[15:58:48 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> looks like fun...
[16:57:58 CST(-0600)] <tbain> Have a good weekend everyone - off for family birthday stuff!
[16:59:03 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> have fun
[16:59:11 CST(-0600)] <tbain> thanks
[17:20:00 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> Are counselors/coaches traditionally loaded into the external_person table?
[17:20:15 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> Or just students and faculty?
[17:20:59 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> you've got to load coaches into external_person
[17:21:52 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> this came up yesterday w/ CLC. sent you the relevant email
[17:28:00 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> That's helps. What if a coach doesn't exist in UP with a role?
[17:30:11 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> Nevermind. I think I found it.
[17:30:53 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> when they log in they'll get an unpleasant experience
[17:31:15 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> couldn't that happen with the SSO?
[17:34:39 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> depending on how the SSO works you could use attributes it passes to create a user just in time
[17:35:38 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> the way the Angel SSO worked, uPortal had to be able to find you either in AD or as a uP local user
[17:36:37 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> that's where it would get the attributes that put you into a security group
[17:39:18 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> sorry to keep at this, but. if the user only exists in AD with a role, then would we be able to query the role to look up the department_name from external_person to list the department in the report search criteria?
[17:40:52 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> ooookay
[17:40:55 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54>
[17:40:56 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> so
[17:41:07 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> we're definitely talking about coaches right now, right?
[17:41:17 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> yes
[17:42:40 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> if a coach is returned in the coach lookup API, then you know it at least has a person record, and it almost certainly has a external_person record from which that person record was derived. doesn't necessarily mean they also have a department listed in either of those records, of course
[17:43:28 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> cool. thanks
[17:43:47 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> so if all you want to do is list relevant departments in the report form you should be able to query the person record (with a join, actually)
[17:44:10 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> if you then want to filter the coach list in the report form, i.e. client side, by department, you probably have to change the API
[17:44:19 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> b/c i bet that info isn't included
[17:44:29 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum54> (you're getting some sort of PersonLiteTO or CoachLiteTO)
[17:44:45 CST(-0600)] <JasonElwood> yeah. I'm just trying to make sure we don't have any holes in the department list