Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Draft

This is a draft proposal for discussion purposes.

The OpenRegistry Advisory Committee is a voluntary group asked to review and comment on the progress of the OpenRegistry initiative, in order to provide feedback to active OpenRegistry Developer Institutions.

  1. The ORAC would advise on both content and process and would draw from interested higher ed parties and experience open source developers.
    1. Any higher ed (.edu or .ac.) institution with an interest in the OpenRegistry initiative is eligible to participate on the Committee.
    2. Any commercial or non-profit organization with experience in open source development and an interest in seeing the OpenRegistry initiative grow would also be eligible
  2. OpenRegistry Developer Institutions are ineligible to participate on the Committee.
  3. The ORAC would meet once a month to review the progress of the OpenRegistry development and provide guidance or feedback to the Developer Institutions.
  4. The Committee members would be active on OpenRegistry development email list and would weigh in on discussions where Developer Institutions have questions about the universality of functionality or about open source development processes
  5. Initial membership is by invitation, however any eligible institutions may ask either the Committee or a Developer Institution for an invitation.
  6. Participating Institutions may select one representative to the Committee.
  7. Representatives may be removed if they are found by the consensus of Committee members or the consensus of Developer Institutions to be not participating.
  8. All activities of the Committee are public. Notes from any meetings are to be posted.
  9. The Committee is not a binding authority – it does not make decisions that the initiative must follow.
  10. The Committee may be disbanded if a formal Steering Committee is established or if the initiative becomes dormant.

Potential Candidates for Invitation

  • Jonathan Markow on behalf of Jasig
  • Benn Oshrin - experienced Identity Management and Open Source developer
  • Jens Haeusser from University of British Columbia (IdAM expert involved in an initiative to promote open source IdAM alternatives)
  • A representative from University of South Florida (Eric Pierce?)
  • A representative from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • A representative from Penn State
  • A representative from Unicon (valuable understanding of the requirements for an open source project to be of value to many institutions)
  • No labels