[11:13:18 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> Greetings uPortal devs: I read on the mail list that 4.0.2 is planned to be cut next week. Is the fix for multi-valued user attributes in that? I know we chatted here about it but I don't think a ticket ever got created.
[11:13:59 CDT(-0500)] <athena> any objection to taking that most popular portlets portlet out of the 3.2 default layout?
[11:15:13 CDT(-0500)] <athena> dont' think it actually works on a lot of non-hsql databases
[11:37:43 CDT(-0500)] <athena> EricDalquist: looking at UP-3195, which notes that if you have the missing channel in your layout, you cant' add new content
[11:37:49 CDT(-0500)] <athena> have a temporary fix that makes that problem go away
[11:38:02 CDT(-0500)] <athena> but do we want to just strip the channel out of the layout entirely when the layout is resaved?
[11:51:32 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> sorry athena, was on a conf call with terrecotta
[11:51:37 CDT(-0500)] <athena> no worries 
[11:52:01 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> they are going to help us get uPortal working on the heap size based cache config when ehcache 2.5 comes out
[11:52:14 CDT(-0500)] <athena> oh wow, that sounds awesome
[11:52:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> they also said that if we get an out of the box terrecotta config setup they would add uPortal to their validation suite for terrecottta
[11:52:33 CDT(-0500)] <athena> oh wow
[11:52:42 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> b-rock: a fix was committed for that
[11:52:53 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> thank you EricDalquist!!
[11:53:47 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> b-rock: https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-3217
[11:54:48 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> cool. quick question EricDalquist. Is the procedure for non-comitters to submit a patch to uPortal now the same as creating a ticket and attaching the patch, or should we try to do a pull request through github?
[11:55:33 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> I don't have anything to submit at the moment, but I'm sure I will eventually.
[11:55:58 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> either way is fine
[11:56:12 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> doing a pull request through github will get your fix in the fastest though
[11:56:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> since then someone can review the diff and merge it in the github UI
[11:56:36 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> which makes it REALLY fast and easy
[11:56:43 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> ok great. I have been trying it but haven't done a pull request yet.