Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Corrected links that should have been relative instead of absolute.

...

[16:52:04 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and just set content type to something like text/html

[16:52:07 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> its really gross

[16:52:19 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and a fairly significant amount of work

[16:52:24 CDT(-0500)] <athena> i think we are going to need to start supporting html5, particularly for mobile

[16:52:29 CDT(-0500)] <athena> so perhaps umobile can help out with it

[16:52:34 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah

[16:52:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> well umobile will be easier

[16:52:45 CDT(-0500)] <athena> so what does every single portlet need to support HTML5?

[16:52:47 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> sicne you only ever have 1 portlet at a time on a page

[16:52:58 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> every portlet rendered on the page needs to support it

[16:53:07 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> or it could render output that isn't valid

[16:53:11 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and make the browser barf

[16:53:34 CDT(-0500)] <athena> that's only true if there's content that's valid HTML4 that's not valid in HTML5, right?

[16:53:56 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> or if there is structurally invalid content I believe

[16:54:24 CDT(-0500)] <athena> does look like there's a distinction between HTML5 and XHTML5

[16:54:37 CDT(-0500)] <athena> perhaps we'd be in better shape w/ the non-XHTML version?

[16:54:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah

[16:54:45 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> its worth a try (smile)

[16:54:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> it has been a long while since I played with it

[16:55:09 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> crap have to run