Page Comparison

...

1. Review old Action Items
2. What to do about the Outlook web app documentation
3. What to do with ClearPass
4. EOL of CAS 3
5. Unicon Cooperative Support
6. SAML support in Java Client (Shib cross interest)
7. Fluid collaboration
8. Possible Contrib: Lotus Domino support
9. Discuss high level vision
   1. CAS "info sheet"
   2. Positioning statement, vs I2 middleware, Sun, Oracle, etc

Notes

1. List of offered contrib/clients includes
   1. .NET Client (Princeton, Virginia Tech)
   2. HTTP Form Connector (Martin Daur)
   3. Multi-LDAP (Université de Toulouse)
   4. Lotus Domino (LSU)
   5. ClearPass (Unicon, Sacramento State)
2. After some confusing discussion around CASifying Outlook Web Access, it became clear that we should follow up with Andrew
3. ClearPass
   1. The next step according to the RFC Process is to open discussion on cas-dev
   2. There was some discussion about who would "support" ClearPass and whether or not it should be more than contrib
4. CAS 3 will remain supported for one year following the release of CAS 4
   1. Support probably means security and major bug fixes
   2. uPortal provide support for the current and prior releases, which works out to approximately one year
5. Unicon has no CAS committers (unlike for uPortal), and will need to follow standard procedures to get commit access should they desire it for their new Cooperative Support for CAS

Action Items

• Benn: Update RFC Process for Howard's commentsScott: Write definitions for contrib, give to Benn to review against Incubation terminology (see also AI from January 2009 Conference CallCreate a wiki page to track what's where in the RFC process
• Benn: Schedule call with Andrew Petro to follow up on CASifying Outlook Web Access
• Benn: Post ClearPass to cas-dev
• Benn: Schedule next community call to discuss RFC items, steering committee updates
• Scott: Provide analysis on ClearPass
• Scott: Call John Lewis with respect to Unicon/Sacramento State support for ClearPass
• Benn: Draft end of support statement for CAS 3 in wiki for steering committee to review, then present to CAS list/community

Carryover

• Scott: Poke around to see if anyone is interested in the subgroup lead positions, and/or in maintaining CAS 3.x
• All: Discuss high level vision at Dallas

Carryover

• Scott: Roadmap cleanup & updates, including
• Add to JIRA
• Add a column to the roadmap indicating who has committed to doing what
Sort roadmap items into the groups identified in the agenda and find leads for each
• New Working Groups: Begin requirements gathering and prioritize decision
• ?: Propose clear text password feature as test of new development process