[08:32:52 CDT(-0500)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[08:32:59 CDT(-0500)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has left ##uportal
[08:34:08 CDT(-0500)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@adsl-71-150-245-185.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net) has joined ##uportal
[08:57:03 CDT(-0500)] * ChanServ sets mode +o JASIGLogBot
[08:59:00 CDT(-0500)] * bszabo (n=bszabo@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:18:01 CDT(-0500)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[10:07:59 CDT(-0500)] * dmccallum (n=dmccallu@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:08:09 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> EricDalquist, i hear you're looking for candidate issues to work on for the near-term uP3 release.
[10:08:16 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah
[10:08:20 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> getting to that point
[10:08:35 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> anything that is bothering you guys that you'd like some help on?
[10:08:47 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> we lost Allen Haws back to a Cisco project, so he had to leave some things midstream that you might find interesting
[10:09:19 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok, what are they?
[10:09:22 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> specifically, he was working on portlet mode controls and had made some progress, but had run afoul of some caching problems, i believe
[10:09:54 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> i think the closest issue in the ja-sig jira is UPT-191, which doesn't provide much detail....
[10:10:22 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> 
that is a bit short on info
[10:10:40 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> there's not much detail in our jira either. but, I can either email or check in the code he had cooked up
[10:11:01 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> can you email me a patch off of HEAD of his work?
[10:11:12 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> can do
[10:12:15 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> the other two candidates i saw were UPT-67, which I don't think bszabo is going to have time to finish up this month, and UPT-193, which was another Allen Haws item
[10:13:13 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok
[10:13:22 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> I'm also probably not going to get to UPT-99 by the end of the month, and I've run into some issues with WSRP on Oracle that I probably won't get to either
[10:13:25 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> upt-191 is just that - provide ability to set rendering attributes for a portlet at publish time
[10:13:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ah ok
[10:13:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> so an addition to the portlet manager to provide that UI?
[10:14:05 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> yes, an optional screen
[10:14:09 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok
[10:14:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> optional as in not required to have anything filled out?
[10:15:01 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> right
[10:15:04 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok
[10:15:46 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> although we may come up with some standard ones (e.g. icon) to fill, or at least have defaults. portlet mode controls that dmccallum mentioned can be implemented this way as well
[10:16:09 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> pl
[10:16:10 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok
[10:16:23 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that shouldn't be too hard once the base UI is there
[10:17:01 CDT(-0500)] <bszabo> Eric, let me know if you look at UPT-67, because I have some incomplete work that fixes some of the test failures.
[10:17:02 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> upt-193 - replace the jar with the standard version
[10:17:23 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah
[10:17:50 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I've assigned 191 and 193 to me
[10:18:12 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I'm not enough of a hibernate guy to know how to doUPT-99 (I couldn't figure it out when I did the original mappings)
[10:18:14 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> ok... it looks like we were tracking Allen's work on portlet mode controls under an issue that we have mapped to UPT-188, which doesn't say anything at all about portlet mode controls. i vote to open a new UPT issue and attach allen's partial patch
[10:18:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> sounds good
[10:18:50 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> with that one, UPT-99, is it talking about problems like orphaned portlet preferences?
[10:19:14 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and orphaned portlet domain objects, say you delete a portlet app def
[10:19:24 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> there is a whole tree of dependent objects that need to be removed
[10:20:07 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> ok... i think what's going on there is that cascading deletes don't work if you have defined a uni-directional graph of full-blown entities
[10:20:37 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> well the problem I was having is our domain object structure doesn't have any actual object references
[10:20:54 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> we just list the object IDs
[10:24:20 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> fair enough. i hadn't looked at the entire domain object structure, just preferences.
[10:25:02 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> there very well may be a way to get hibernate to do the foreign keys and cascading deletes I just don't know enough about it to figure out how
[10:25:07 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> i'm still willing to work on upt-99, but it sounds like the issue might be more complicated than i had been thinking. in any event, i probably won't get to it this month.
[10:25:16 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> ok
[10:25:28 CDT(-0500)] <peterk> if you figure that out, let me know - I have a similar problem in portlet window mapping dao
[10:25:34 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> will do
[10:25:38 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> well I'll also add UPT-67 to my plate
[10:26:07 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I should be able to address all 3 of those next week (at least get the two easy ones done)
[10:26:24 CDT(-0500)] * peterk is glad to have Eric back on uP3
[10:26:48 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum> bszabo, did you check in any patches for UPT-67?
[10:27:17 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I'm glad to be back on it
[10:27:47 CDT(-0500)] <bszabo> No I have not. I will get that stuff in... Is Monday early enough?
General
Content
Integrations