[10:01:02 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> and now it really is Thursday
[10:01:17 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> today's project: adding un-favoriting capability to Favorites
[10:01:35 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> with possible detour to migrate a CVS repo to Git.
[10:01:56 CST(-0600)] <tlev> note there is a topic branch for favorites
[10:05:50 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> I do love me some topic branches
[10:06:21 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> I may resist the urge to create an unfavorite sub-topic-branch branched off that topic branch
[12:39:23 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> so, banging my head against intportal database initialization again, of course
[12:40:03 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> what's the issue?
[12:41:17 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> check this out:
[12:42:27 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> https://gist.github.com/8339551
[12:43:21 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> https://gist.github.com/8339567
[12:43:36 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> (loving Sublime Gist support, incidentally)
[12:44:31 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> what I think I'm doing is successfully importing a favorite-lo user, successfully importing a fragment definition pointing at that user, and then failing in importing a fragment-layout pointing at that user
[12:44:43 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> did you look at the reports in target?
[12:45:04 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> yes, that's where those two gists are coming from
[12:45:43 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> former is the data-import.txt tightened down to show the relevant successes and failure, latter is the file specifically about the failing-to-import fragment layout definition
[12:45:45 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> no detailed text file?
[12:46:18 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> https://gist.github.com/apetro/8339567 ? 