Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Next »

[10:59:37 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> Hi there. Question: is there a way I can assign a JIRA to myself?

[10:59:53 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> for the uportal project?

[11:00:09 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> yup.

[11:00:29 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> you need to be part of the uportal-developers group

[11:00:39 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> though I think now that we're in git we can be more open with that

[11:00:44 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> what is your username in jira?

[11:00:54 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> should be: mmoayyed

[11:01:19 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> try now

[11:02:31 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> logged out and back in, all the same.

[11:05:16 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok

[11:05:22 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> might take a bit for it to propegate into jira

[11:05:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> so try again in like an hour

[11:05:53 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> ok thanks. On that note, have you have a chance to review pull #81?

[11:06:00 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> this is to upgrade the bundled CAS to 3.5

[11:08:09 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I haven't

[11:08:20 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I'll take a look though before 4.0.8

[11:09:02 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> thanks. I am ramping up to get a pull going for UP-3298, Tomcat7. But I think that might be more suitable for 4.1.

[11:09:19 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> are there things that don't work in TC7 right now?

[11:12:01 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> This is pretty much the stack trace I get: https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-3298

[11:12:17 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ah

[11:12:17 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok

[11:12:26 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> that is annoying

[11:12:56 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I wonder if we can support TC6 and 7

[11:13:04 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> or if the change will make it not work on TC6

[11:14:01 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> I think it's going to break TC6, which is why I thought it might be better for a 4.1 release. I'll poke around a bit more, but doesn't look too promising.

[11:14:15 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> yeah it would have to be for 4.1 then

  • No labels