[09:47:48 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> EricDalquist: Goog morning
[09:47:53 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> good morning
[09:47:54 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> Good morning
[09:47:56 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> 
[09:48:01 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I'm slowly reading through your email
[09:48:11 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> Sorry - too long of an email
[09:48:18 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> no problem
[09:48:19 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> You can ignore the future refactor part
[09:48:21 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I'm also still waking up
[09:48:31 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> I understand completely
[09:49:02 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> I hope my explanations aren't too confusing...
[09:50:11 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> Does the problem discussed in (b) make sense?
[09:50:20 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> so this is an extension of what we talked about last week right?
[09:50:24 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> yes
[09:51:21 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> part (a) is what we discussed; adding a set of <K extends BaseAggregationK> to the DAOs so the query can include a set of tabs ids (in this particular case). This is done
[09:51:55 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok ... just a sec have to review something else for my manager
[09:52:17 CST(-0600)] <jwennmacher> sure. no problem