[07:20:54 EDT(-0400)] * mad (n=chatzill@pcit-8752.HIG.SE) has joined ##uportal
[08:42:10 EDT(-0400)] * anastasiac (n=stasia@bas16-toronto63-1177909778.dsl.bell.ca) has joined ##uportal
[10:05:23 EDT(-0400)] * jessm (n=Jess@c-76-19-199-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:09:49 EDT(-0400)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[11:06:34 EDT(-0400)] * lennard1 (n=sparhk@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[11:22:20 EDT(-0400)] * holdorph (n=holdorph@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[11:31:48 EDT(-0400)] * mrboris (i=mrboris@philbennet.augustana.edu) has joined ##uportal
[11:32:24 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> hello all, I'm looking for some install instructions specifically for IIS6, has anyone got uportal running on this?
[11:33:05 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> is tomcat required for IIS installs?
[11:33:16 EDT(-0400)] * bulloche (n=bulloche@134.250.4.77) has joined ##uportal
[11:34:00 EDT(-0400)] <holdorph> a "java servlet container" is required.
[11:34:18 EDT(-0400)] <holdorph> I don't know anything about IIS, but I think it does not do that on it's own.
[11:34:27 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> is tomcat the recommended one for IIS?
[11:34:43 EDT(-0400)] <holdorph> i dont know anyone running IIS, so I couldn't say
[11:34:46 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> ah.
[11:35:32 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> mrboris: Tomcat is the recommended servlet container for uPortal
[11:35:56 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> If you want to use IIS in front of Tomcat that would be a IIS/Tomcat issue
[11:36:21 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> thank you.
[11:42:45 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> found a good guide for making tomcat work with IIS if anyone is interested: http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/configuring-jsp-for-iis/
[11:46:47 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[12:36:43 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> mrboris: Over the last few years many people/institutions/businesses have been running tomcat stand alone with a great deal of success in production environments. Unless you are really attached to IIS you could probably just go that route and save yourself a good deal of pain and suffering.
[12:40:37 EDT(-0400)] <holdorph> running uportal and/or sakai on windows = great pain and suffering, with or without IIS. IIS just adds a bit more to an already great pain.
[12:40:47 EDT(-0400)] <holdorph> probably barely noticeable at that point.
[13:55:59 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> we run our whole website on IIS
[13:56:02 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> sort of stuck w/ it
[14:06:54 EDT(-0400)] <mrboris> we run a CMS (ingeniux) which requires IIS
[16:43:51 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[17:58:44 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[18:15:02 EDT(-0400)] * athena7_ (n=athena7@12.164.139.7) has joined ##uportal
[18:33:29 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[20:24:53 EDT(-0400)] * lennard1 (n=sparhk@uni1.unicon.net) has left ##uportal
[20:44:58 EDT(-0400)] * jessm (n=Jess@c-76-19-199-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined ##uportal
[20:46:54 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@ip68-230-78-172.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal

Browser not supported