In order to provide continuity in evaluating the proposals, the following should be considered:

Criteria	Score	Feedback
Proposal was submitted: all submissions receive one point by default.	+1
Quality of content. The proposal's content is relevant to the topic/track/project and shows a substantial knowledge of the subject.	+1
Audience interest. The content of the proposal is timely and of current interest within the community.	+1
Connector session. Proposal is of interest to more than one track/project/audience across the Jasig and Sakai organizations.	+1
Theme. The proposal aligns with the theme of the conference: "Opening Minds to Open Solutions."	+1
TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE	5

5 = Five elements present (best)
4 = Four elements present
3 = Three elements present
2 = Two elements present
1 = One element present (ummm, not so good)

Proposals you should rate:

Items in the focus area (Teaching, Technical, Leadership/Advocacy/Other) for which you volunteered
Items with which you have passion and experience (whether in an area you signed up for or not)

Proposals you should not rate:

Items that you submitted (abstain)
Items that you feel unqualified to rate (no knowledge or experience with the topic/technology)

Other notes:

Unacceptable presentations: Please mark unacceptable presentations with a score of "1" and add a comment why you feel it is not acceptable.
Poster possibilities: If you find a presentation unacceptable or has a low score, but you feel it may be valuable as a poster presentation, please mark this clearly in the comments section.
Duplicate entries: If you find a duplicate entry, consider the first entry (by ID number) the duplicate and the last entry the "keeper." Mark the duplicate with a "1" and add the comment of "duplicate" and enter the ID number of the "keeper" submission for comparison. In the keeper comments, please also note the ID of the earlier duplicate.
Incorrectly categorized entries: If you find a proposal in your track that does not fit in your track, please update the track and leave a note in the comments/rating area.
Reach out to your peers: If you have questions or need clarification, reach out to the other members of the program committee in your area.

Browser not supported