Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 20 Next »

[11:26:53 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Ok, Dan I created the pull request. I'm a bit rusty, but it appears to me that it worked correctly. I pointed it to the ssp-master branch.

[11:27:18 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> thx. i'll check

[11:31:35 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> 31 unread messages in inbox…. really looking forward to that

[11:31:59 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> my guess is the vast majority are unsolicited notifications re how well SSP is working

[11:33:13 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yes it should be.

[11:36:44 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> sorry my internet was out, had no way to dial into the standup

[11:37:29 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> I'm finishing up SSP-845, then I'll get back around to SSP-521

[11:37:44 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> did we want to talk about SSP-521 at some point today?

[11:40:18 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> yes, based on Dan's availability. I'm on a call until 1p then from 2:30-3:30

[11:40:59 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> sorry about earlier, was not expecting an outage

[11:47:24 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> want to chat when that call wraps up around 1p, then? i assume that's EDT? (10a MST?)

[11:49:29 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> 11

[11:49:32 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> yeah

[11:49:40 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> 10 minutes in otherwords

[11:49:42 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> ?

[11:49:46 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> the works

[11:50:07 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> that works*

[11:51:09 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> 54545 bridge?

[11:51:16 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> sure

[12:26:30 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> possibly related to SSP-521, or at least another dead-ending scenario to check: https://issues.jasig.org/browse/SSP-530

[12:28:27 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> here's the ticket for the side-effects of a lookup by school_id resulting in excessive warnings about overwriting an existing record: https://issues.jasig.org/browse/SSP-515

[12:30:51 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> the ticket says the way to fix it would be to introduce a lookup API without side-effects, which I still think is probably a good idea in general. but i think it's probably also true that the UI needs to be a bit smarter. I about knowing when it should throw itself into edit mode… specifically if an internal person record is found when you press 'retrieve' from external. it's been a long time since i've been in that code but

[12:34:00 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> ok

[18:17:44 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Hey dan I do think we have a problem with search. I've had my suspicions the last couple days but I think I'm closer to what is happening (the actual issue not the cause).

[18:18:20 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> So I have the user I've been testing these reports with and a couple others. usually they disapper over days, today it happend within a few hours.

[18:18:49 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> I select * from db and he is there, but the search tool doesn't pick him up.

[18:19:40 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> The object status is 2?!?

[18:38:25 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> sweet

[18:38:33 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> nobody else is testing?

[18:38:55 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> testing what?

[18:39:18 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> sorry… nobody else is testing in the same env and deleting your users out from under you?

[18:39:29 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Nope its my local unless you hacked in (smile)

[18:40:12 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> shhhh

[18:40:19 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> The docs person has spend a bit of time the last couple of days on Linux CI but she couldn't pinpoint anything and Jason has altered it a bit, so I thought all was well, until I couldn't find my users.

[18:40:35 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> um

[18:40:46 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> do you have query logging enabled in your local postgres instance?

[18:41:08 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> So, I'm tyring to think how its getting set. No, that is probably the next step.

[18:41:08 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> if not, definitely do that so when it happens again we can go back and try to get some idea of the context in which the deletion occurred

[18:41:43 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Definately

[18:42:07 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> where else have we done work recently that would PUT to a person record...

[18:42:41 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> or… where else in the app have you been working just prior to this happening… only in search?

  • No labels