Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

[11:34:15 CDT(-0500)] <GregElliott> The folk as SPC had a question about the Action Plan in 1.2, and that the ordering of referrals(tasks) is not alphabetical.  Also, when they add tasks, they don't seem to go in alphabetically. I know there was a similar q regarding Journal entries, and that sort order was fixed as of 2.0, so wondered if this might be similar instance.

[11:38:08 CDT(-0500)] <js701> Good question. It was not given to me. So not sure. It is a quick fix.

[11:38:46 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> sorting was fixed in 2.0

[11:39:18 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> the exact issue in action plan… I'd need to see what they are talking about. Is it that they want to sort tasks added to the action plan?

[11:41:25 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Just checked it out for you. Seems when adding a task the refferels are sorted alphabetical by folder, inside the folder is not necessarily. As for the tasks added they are alphabetical by folder name which is the header but inside, seem to be in order by due date.

[11:42:01 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Sorry didn't see Jason's responses.

[11:42:56 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> those are good points. I was asking about the assigned tasks. you brought up a great observation about the reference items from which tasks are created

[11:47:54 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yeah, we will need some more clarification, but it seems to look good in 2.0.

[12:22:31 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> Going to be away for 30-45 mins

[12:25:19 CDT(-0500)] <GregElliott> will forward the screen cap of what spc is seeing as illustration. Thanks to all for chiming in!!!

[12:58:45 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> just let us know. we'll be able to provide a better response

[14:27:01 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> Paul

[14:27:07 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yes

[14:27:11 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> your changes to mygps

[14:27:19 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> you need to change the source coffee script

[14:27:29 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> the files you checked in should be generated

[14:28:11 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> has anyone walked you through how to make changes to the mygps javascript?

[14:28:22 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Which commit? My first one yes, I didn't generate it.

[14:28:26 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Then Dan let me know how to do it. I generated the scripts and changed the coffee file, but the generated scripts even with no changes were having service errors.

[14:28:49 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> So, I took the previous good generated files and since the modifications were small and in cleartext just applied them manually.

[14:29:24 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> That was the commit earlier today. Let me know if there are any issues with mygps after the latest commit.

[14:29:39 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> im confused

[14:30:02 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> any changes you make to the mygps javascript would get clobbered the next time someone generates

[14:30:31 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Not so, because I did edit the coffee file as well.

[14:31:27 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> ok, if Dan guided you through this im sure we're fine

[14:31:30 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> just saw a red flag

[14:33:20 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yeah, no problem, its good to have a second pair of eyes. It still should be tested on CI's tmrw or whenever they rebuild, which I'll do, but it seems to be working reliably minified and unminified on my end.

[14:33:33 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> cool

[14:34:03 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon1> she is a tricky beast

[18:10:00 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> bouncing Linux CI

  • No labels