Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

[08:02:01 CST(-0600)] * deuce (n=deuce@ip68-110-100-205.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:13:02 CST(-0600)] * deuce (n=deuce@ip68-110-100-205.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:18:37 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[10:26:31 CST(-0600)] * deuce_ (n=deuce@ip70-190-171-187.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:56:50 CST(-0600)] * deuce_ (n=deuce@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:58:16 CST(-0600)] <deuce_> eric
[10:59:47 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> hey
[11:00:18 CST(-0600)] <deuce_> expert spring mvc and web flow .. by Seth Ladd
[11:00:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> just looking at that on amazon, thanks (smile)
[11:00:37 CST(-0600)] <deuce_> cool (smile)
[11:00:54 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> off to a meeting!
[11:00:58 CST(-0600)] <deuce_> peace
[11:31:51 CST(-0600)] * dmccallum (n=dmccallu@plmomibas02-lo10-a444.plmomi.tds.net) has joined ##uportal
[13:06:54 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[13:49:47 CST(-0600)] * deuce_ (n=deuce@ip70-190-171-187.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[13:52:06 CST(-0600)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[13:52:50 CST(-0600)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has left ##uportal
[14:06:19 CST(-0600)] * peterk (i=[U2FsdGV@66.226.77.81) has joined ##uportal
[14:10:21 CST(-0600)] <peterk> Guys, what's the status of migration to SVN and subsequent move to maven? I remember at the status meeting someone mentioned that we needed to reach agreement with JASIG folks regarding SVN.
[14:19:10 CST(-0600)] * agherna (n=argherna@singularity.ci.uiuc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[15:13:31 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> peterk, the SVN move has sort of stalled. i sent an email to the clearinghouse list a few weeks ago with the changes i wanted to make to apache config so we could re-use our existing commercial cert, but i didn't get any feedback and haven't followed up
[15:14:13 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> i wonder if its something we really want to bite off for RC1 or would it just be so much extra noise?
[15:15:07 CST(-0600)] <peterk> I think the main argument for it is that we we'll have the stage set for further development, which is something we really want to do to involve community as much as possible after RC1

  • No labels