[03:30:28 CST(-0600)] * edalquist (n=dalquist@76.210.71.51) has joined ##uportal
[03:48:25 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@76.210.71.51) has joined ##uportal
[09:19:10 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[10:17:48 CST(-0600)] * peterk (n=Kharchen@24-181-226-126.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com) has joined ##uportal
[12:03:13 CST(-0600)] * dmccallum (n=dmccallu@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[16:32:29 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> anybody have a clear idea of how close to complete uP3 wsrp functionality is, if we ignore the issue of ORM technologies?
[16:32:43 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> that is, if we can live with JDO, can we consider WSRP more or less 'done'?
[16:32:57 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I knwo it "works" not sure what level of spec compliance there is though
[16:33:13 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> we can consume WSRP and produce published portlets as WSRP
[16:34:30 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> do you know if michael is still actively working on the dao layer, or plans to actively work on the dao layer in the next 2 1/2 weeks or so?
[16:35:09 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I very much doubt anything in the next few weeks
[16:35:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> and I don't get the feeling he'll be doing much more on it at all
[16:35:35 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> but I don't know for sure
[16:36:37 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> do you have a sense if what's in HEAD at this very moment is worth including in the december RC?
[16:36:47 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> for WSRP?
[16:36:50 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> yes
[16:36:50 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> yes I think it is
[16:37:01 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> there will likely need to be some documentation
General
Content
Integrations