[01:44:28 EDT(-0400)] * lennar1 (n=sparhk@ip68-98-56-21.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[03:30:24 EDT(-0400)] * mad (n=chatzill@pcit-8752.HIG.SE) has joined ##uportal
[08:06:02 EDT(-0400)] * jessm (n=Jess@c-76-19-199-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:12:57 EDT(-0400)] * athena7 (n=athena7@adsl-99-149-83-32.dsl.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:48:12 EDT(-0400)] * jessm (n=Jess@c-76-19-199-61.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined ##uportal
[09:59:13 EDT(-0400)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[10:47:53 EDT(-0400)] * lennar1 (n=sparhk@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[11:02:21 EDT(-0400)] * michelled (n=team@142.150.154.197) has joined ##uportal
[11:07:56 EDT(-0400)] * holdorph (n=holdorph@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[11:55:23 EDT(-0400)] * bulloche (n=bulloche@134.250.4.77) has joined ##uportal
[12:22:28 EDT(-0400)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[12:23:44 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> so Alfresco looks pretty cool
[12:23:50 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> anyone here have any experience with it?
[12:33:37 EDT(-0400)] * lennar1 does
[12:33:49 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> about a year and a half's worth
[12:34:05 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> mostly from the perspective of JSR 170
[12:34:16 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> good/bad/?
[12:34:44 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> As a whole, they have a very rich set of features and the product has been quite stable in production.
[12:35:14 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> with regards to JCR, they have a good deal of marketing which professes a commitment to JCR. Their actions suggest otherwise.
[12:35:44 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> in my opinion, if you want to build a JCR app, and that is your only goal, then go with something like Jackrabbit.
[12:36:15 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> Such was not Pearson's entire goal. The liked the upside of all the features and the performance/stability story that alfresco could tell.
[12:36:34 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> so... we went with alfresco, in spite of their mediocre JSR 170 support.
[12:36:41 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> looking from a CMS/Document Management/Web Filesystem perspective
[12:37:16 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> if you are just looking to drop a portlet in, alfresco has a nice one.
[12:37:32 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> they effectively crammed their entire webapp into a single mega portlet.
[12:38:03 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> lol
[12:38:25 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> take a look at alfresco's features. They have a great story from the ECM perspective and have recently added WCM.
[12:39:10 EDT(-0400)] <lennar1> I deployed their portlet into uPortal, it ran well... but Pearson had specialized needs and preferred to construct their own portlet with alfresco's repository on the backend.
General
Content
Integrations