Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

[10:59:37 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> Hi there. Question: is there a way I can assign a JIRA to myself?

[10:59:53 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> for the uportal project?

[11:00:09 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> yup.

[11:00:29 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> you need to be part of the uportal-developers group

[11:00:39 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> though I think now that we're in git we can be more open with that

[11:00:44 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> what is your username in jira?

[11:00:54 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> should be: mmoayyed

[11:01:19 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> try now

[11:02:31 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> logged out and back in, all the same.

[11:05:16 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok

[11:05:22 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> might take a bit for it to propegate into jira

[11:05:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> so try again in like an hour

[11:05:53 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> ok thanks. On that note, have you have a chance to review pull #81?

[11:06:00 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> this is to upgrade the bundled CAS to 3.5

[11:08:09 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I haven't

[11:08:20 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I'll take a look though before 4.0.8

[11:09:02 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> thanks. I am ramping up to get a pull going for UP-3298, Tomcat7. But I think that might be more suitable for 4.1.

[11:09:19 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> are there things that don't work in TC7 right now?

[11:12:01 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> This is pretty much the stack trace I get: https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-3298

[11:12:17 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ah

[11:12:17 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok

[11:12:26 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> that is annoying

[11:12:56 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I wonder if we can support TC6 and 7

[11:13:04 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> or if the change will make it not work on TC6

[11:14:01 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> I think it's going to break TC6, which is why I thought it might be better for a 4.1 release. I'll poke around a bit more, but doesn't look too promising.

[11:14:15 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> yeah it would have to be for 4.1 then

[11:18:09 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> coolio.

[11:18:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> though really moving to JDK7 and TC7 for 4.1 is probably a reasonable step

[11:20:31 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> great. so, in my pull, I

[11:20:40 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> I will also force the build to be on JDK7

[11:21:13 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> do two different pulls

[11:21:22 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> those are two different and really unrelated changes

[11:21:29 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> other than they are both "7" (smile)

[11:21:55 CST(-0600)] <mmoayyed> (big grin) no problem.

[11:22:04 CST(-0600)] <athena> at what point are we going to pull this into uportal?

[11:22:19 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> what do you mean athena?

[11:22:26 CST(-0600)] <athena> the jdk7 change in particular

[11:22:37 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> not sure ...

[11:22:37 CST(-0600)] <athena> just wondering at what point we're going to integrate that into the trunk

[11:22:45 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> do you have any concerns about it?

[11:22:56 CST(-0600)] <athena> just the normal mac jdk-switching stupidness

[11:23:00 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ah

[11:23:07 CST(-0600)] <athena> imagine it'll make it harder to work on both 4.1 and 4.0.x alternately

[11:23:12 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> yeah ...

[11:23:20 CST(-0600)] <athena> completely stupid that that's even an issue

[11:23:29 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> well it depends on if 4.0 compiles on jdk7

[11:23:32 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I think it might

[11:23:58 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> maven will still have the compiler generate 1.6 compatible class files for 4.0

[11:24:07 CST(-0600)] <athena> ah, gotcha

[11:24:11 CST(-0600)] <athena> so that might help indeed

  • No labels