...
[10:40:54 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for us the problem is to watch from what this is comming, we can't place log on ajp without to rebuild debian packes
[10:41:34 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we solved this problem by adding a table lock when creating a user
[10:41:56 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and we inserted the main part of our active users
[10:42:10 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> with files definitions
[10:43:00 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> And now one of our next problem is external integrated link in http whereas our portail is in https ...
[10:43:39 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for other things this going well, expect that we lost a lot of users after the problems we had
[10:44:31 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> So now I have to watch on our improvment to make some PR 
[10:47:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> tlev: when watching on PR i have again 2 PR in waiting UP-3760 - Adding portlet on locked tab/column and UP-3755 - Adding Portlet Parameter 'alternativeMaximixedLink' what is your feeling about to integrate it ? in my case it's in production on our 4.0.12 version
[10:48:43 CDT(-0500)] <tlev> I will try to look at these sometime this week
[10:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> ok thanks you
[10:51:18 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> Also we are working with esup about an alternative smartldapGroupStore using Grouper
[10:51:44 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> with grouper there is a tool to publish group in ldap
[10:51:55 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and we are using this groupStore
[10:52:53 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> so this could be also a feedback
[10:53:21 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we have around 39k group maintained in memory from this group store
[10:54:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but we surely have to talk about some performance problems with portlets using the method isuserinRole that request massive groups
[10:55:30 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> the abstraction in uportal make too much request on groupStores and when you use massive group structure portlts are really slow to render
[10:56:09 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for this part we have to talk in ESUP group before to make you a feed back
[11:13:52 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> And the last thing that i forgot where on a strange system params
[11:14:08 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we needed to reduce the size of the MTU
[11:14:46 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> else some problems appear in email-preview and other problems where file upload is possible