Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

[10:38:53 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> after a user refreshed

[10:39:56 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we don't know why but the load-balancer have some times problems with balancer member in error during 2 or 3 seconds

[10:40:11 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and only in a higth load

[10:40:54 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for us the problem is to watch from what this is comming, we can't place log on ajp without to rebuild debian packes

[10:41:34 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we solved this problem by adding a table lock when creating a user

[10:41:56 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and we inserted the main part of our active users

[10:42:10 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> with files definitions

[10:43:00 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> And now one of our next problem is external integrated link in http whereas our portail is in https ...

[10:43:39 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for other things this going well, expect that we lost a lot of users after the problems we had

[10:44:31 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> So now I have to watch on our improvment to make some PR (wink)

[10:47:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> tlev: when watching on PR i have again 2 PR in waiting UP-3760 - Adding portlet on locked tab/column and UP-3755 - Adding Portlet Parameter 'alternativeMaximixedLink' what is your feeling about to integrate it ? in my case it's in production on our 4.0.12 version

[10:48:43 CDT(-0500)] <tlev> I will try to look at these sometime this week

[10:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> ok thanks you

[10:51:18 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> Also we are working with esup about an alternative smartldapGroupStore using Grouper

[10:51:44 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> with grouper there is a tool to publish group in ldap

[10:51:55 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and we are using this groupStore

[10:52:53 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> so this could be also a feedback

[10:53:21 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we have around 39k group maintained in memory from this group store

[10:54:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but we surely have to talk about some performance problems with portlets using the method isuserinRole that request massive groups

[10:55:30 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> the abstraction in uportal make too much request on groupStores and when you use massive group structure portlts are really slow to render

[10:56:09 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for this part we have to talk in ESUP group before to make you a feed back

[11:13:52 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> And the last thing that i forgot where on a strange system params

[11:14:08 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we needed to reduce the size of the MTU

[11:14:46 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> else some problems appear in email-preview and other problems where file upload is possible