Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

[11:27:04 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> all other DBs see a big performance hit if you are always doing TXs on reads

[11:27:29 CDT(-0500)] <drewwills> sounds like the discussions that went down w/ portlet preferences

[11:27:36 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yup

[11:27:46 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> we solved it with a bunch of custom transaction handling code in uportal

[11:27:50 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> but it would be worth testing

[11:27:54 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> before having to port all that over

[11:27:59 CDT(-0500)] <drewwills> yeah

[11:29:51 CDT(-0500)] <drewwills> i expect we'll have to refine this one over time... i'm just glad to begin the plugging of this big hole

[11:29:57 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah

[11:30:13 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> just want to make sure it gets checked before we get stuck and have to figure out a schema change

[11:39:55 CDT(-0500)] <drewwills> a schema change would stink... i hope it doesn't come to that... perhaps we'll have a near-term chance to set it all up for a postgress-using client... in that case, i'm certain it would get hit pretty hard