Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

[15:04:28 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> ok thanks.

[15:46:21 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> Hi EricDalquist. So I was able to export a portlet definition for the webProxyPortlet and manually add some header names and values. I can see them in the summary view of the portlet, but when I go to the rich configuration edit mode, the interface goes back down to just the 5 available slots.

[15:46:30 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yup

[15:46:38 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> Is there maybe another template or config file I could edit?

[15:46:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> you'll need to forgo the rich config for this portlet

[15:46:51 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> you'd have to modify the web proxy portlet source code

[15:47:19 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> well I do bulid that portlet as an overlay so adjusting the source code won't be too much of an issue.

[15:47:40 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> do you know the ballpark of what files need to be adjusted?

[15:47:49 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> I think I have seen these xml files before

[15:48:01 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> it is in JSPs

[15:48:09 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> oh right.

[15:48:15 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> you need to find the .jsp file the portlet renders for that page of the config mode

[15:48:16 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and modify it

[15:48:21 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> I don't mind editing that and redeploying

[15:48:57 CDT(-0500)] <b-cause> thanks for the tip. were starting to use that portlet more heavily and I forsee us wanting to pass through any number of headers. thanks for your help

[15:50:14 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yup