...
[17:57:04 CDT(-0500)] <tbain1> I just did a simple write-up of the solution I have for SSP-1411 as a comment on the parent ticket; https://issues.jasig.org/browse/SSP-1402 - let me know if you think there is anything I need to clarify - and I apologize if it's a little weird, I typed it up during a Dev forum so it was difficult to concentrate. 
[17:59:28 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> tbain1 thx
[17:59:37 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> can you re-write it in scala now, pls
[18:01:06 CDT(-0500)] <tbain1> sure
[18:01:09 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> I don't think he can, he needs to learn what a Functor is first
[18:01:24 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Then Monads
[18:02:13 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> he'll be a better person for it
[18:02:34 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> He just learned what they are. So did I.
[18:02:57 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Ok, I took one of the headers from another changeset I know works and transposed in on the changeset and see if that works.
[18:03:01 CDT(-0500)] <tbain1> Functors and Monads
[18:03:02 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> pspaude1 i'm not getting any sort of error or failure from i000038.xml
[18:03:07 CDT(-0500)] <tbain1> A programmer named these things.
[18:03:26 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> a high priest programmer named those things
[18:03:44 CDT(-0500)] <tbain1> with a great white beard
[18:04:15 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yeah, it doesn't error or failure, just says its skipping it. The failure comes in SSP when you try to use it!
[18:04:36 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> js70 look at that student search scream
[18:04:56 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> pspaude1 yeah mine ran just fine. and even created the table and view
[18:05:08 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> you in the big show or listening in at your desk?
[18:05:20 CDT(-0500)] <js70> :^)
[18:05:27 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Awesome! I'll have to try that out. I hope my earlyalert fixes doesn't slow it, but it seemed faster on my local.
[18:05:35 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> I'm at the big show
[18:05:38 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> k
[18:09:55 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Alright, still skipped due to precondition. I deleted the precondition and am trying again. This must be an inconsistency on my machine somehow.
[18:34:35 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Well it ran successfully once the precondition was gone. Weird, the other new changesets ran fine.
[18:34:59 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> But, the search feature is nearly instantaneous on local now!!!
[18:35:15 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum54> we'll see if the CI envs have the same LB issue
[18:35:51 CDT(-0500)] <pspaude1> Yep, hopefully its just my db for whatever reason.