Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Corrected links that should have been relative instead of absolute.

...

[15:43:10 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> double checking the logs now...

[15:49:59 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> so I have this from the FragmentDefinition.isApplicible. http://pastebin.com/UZ20Rceb

[15:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yes and we established that your guest user is working

[15:50:28 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the question is your billbrown user

[15:50:30 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> which isn't working

[15:50:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> either that user has no applicable fragments

[15:50:47 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> or the fragments that are applicable have no content

[15:51:09 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> oh ok. I'll dig that up...

[15:51:22 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I'm heading home

[15:51:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> we can catch up tomorrow

[15:51:49 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> sure np. thanks for your help. could be that all the portlets on the fragment are broken (incompatible portlet 1.0 version)

[15:52:10 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that isn't the case

[15:52:21 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and 1.0 portlets work just fine in 2.0

[15:52:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the spec is 100% backwards compatible

[15:52:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> only 1 or 2 portlets that ship with up4 are 2.0 portlets

[15:52:42 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the rest are still 1.0