...
[15:05:33 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> they're both status in the db… object_status and planning_status
[15:06:56 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> on the phone with patty
[15:06:59 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> one min
[15:07:27 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> anyway… while you think on that… for "all"… the last comment on that, when we still had one field was "all would return all students with active plans"
[15:07:39 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> which implies a distinction between "any" and "all"
[15:08:16 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> was that the intention?
[15:08:50 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> i.e. "ignore this filter" vs "has to have at least a non-null value for this filter"
[15:09:41 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> the intent was either on or off. mismatches in the specs between any and all
[15:10:03 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> so the list would be Any, On and Off
[15:10:25 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> but they could have nothing, which I assumed any would include but it wouldn't be listed in the choice
[15:11:14 CDT(-0500)] <dmccallum541> ok, that was my follow-up. "does 'any' include 'no status'?" i read your answer as "yes"
[15:11:58 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> yeah
[15:18:11 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> Maybe go with MAP Status (on and off plan) and Plan Status (active and inactive)
[15:29:57 CDT(-0500)] <TonyUnicon> ok
[15:35:32 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> I updated the specs
[15:46:52 CDT(-0500)] <js70> I'll weigh in now about 185
[17:27:28 CDT(-0500)] <JasonElwood> "Mama used to chase raccoons off the porch with a broom"