Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Corrected links that should have been relative instead of absolute.

...

[14:59:56 CDT(-0500)] <athena1> maybe i'll see if cleaning up that code makes any difference

[15:26:12 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> Hi EricDalquist. I've got some more debug info in the logs for the pastebin above, but no rendering of the layout in xml. http://pastebin.com/BZh81AKk maybe the error happens before the xml can be logged.

[15:26:26 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> hrm you're right

[15:26:46 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> can you create a jira issue with the stack trace from: http://pastebin.com/g6KJNw84

[15:26:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> (prefferablly not linewrapped (smile) )

[15:27:12 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> sure.

[15:33:11 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> ok I created this https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-3194. As I workaround, do you think I should just try it import the user layouts from our current 3.2.5-patches?

[15:33:41 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> double check and make sure your user qualifies for at least one DLM managed fragment

[15:33:42 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> thanks for your help BTW (smile)

[15:34:21 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I really think that the core of the problem is that you're ending up with no tabs

[15:35:34 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> hmm. ok. I do notice that the unauthenticated guest view does render.

[15:38:09 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and it has at least one tab right?

[15:41:59 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> yes it has the Welcome tab but there is no content/portlets displaying

[15:42:06 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> right

[15:42:08 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> but it has a tab

[15:42:12 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> it does

[15:42:26 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> my guess is that your account does not qualify for any DLM fragments

[15:42:29 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and so has no tabs

[15:42:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and there is apparently a bug in the new URL syntax handling code when a layout has no tabs

[15:43:10 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> double checking the logs now...

[15:49:59 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> so I have this from the FragmentDefinition.isApplicible. http://pastebin.com/UZ20Rceb

[15:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yes and we established that your guest user is working

[15:50:28 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the question is your billbrown user

[15:50:30 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> which isn't working

[15:50:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> either that user has no applicable fragments

[15:50:47 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> or the fragments that are applicable have no content

[15:51:09 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> oh ok. I'll dig that up...

[15:51:22 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I'm heading home

[15:51:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> we can catch up tomorrow

[15:51:49 CDT(-0500)] <b-rock> sure np. thanks for your help. could be that all the portlets on the fragment are broken (incompatible portlet 1.0 version)

[15:52:10 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that isn't the case

[15:52:21 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and 1.0 portlets work just fine in 2.0

[15:52:27 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the spec is 100% backwards compatible

[15:52:40 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> only 1 or 2 portlets that ship with up4 are 2.0 portlets

[15:52:42 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the rest are still 1.0