...
[11:39:51 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> tenants (admins) will have a Skin Manager tool, perhaps based on this OSS tech: http://pikock.github.io/bootstrap-magic/app/index.html
[11:58:37 CST(-0600)] * apetro__ returns
[11:58:56 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> Skin Manager is a neat idea
[11:59:01 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> fname namespaces tenants?
[12:00:46 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> yeah... something i can safely concatenate w/ other stuff and not violate constraints
[12:02:25 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> i might want to display "O'Malley School of De$ign" (if I had such an eccentric tenant), but i wouldn't want to build a portlet fname from that
[12:02:35 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> yup
[12:02:46 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> brb in a bit
[12:03:05 CST(-0600)] <apetro__> bulk-update of multiple tenants post-creation is a matter of bulk edits of entity files via Perl / Sublime?
[12:23:28 CST(-0600)] <drewwills_afk> what would you bulk update about them?
[13:30:26 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> drewwills dunno. If there was something common to them all worth templating, then seems plausible that the template would change and that would want that template change to apply retroactively to already-created tenants?
[13:31:31 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> ah yes, that seems plausible
[13:32:12 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> we discussed that nuance, agreed that it's harder than the templating approach, and decided that templating will meet our needs, for now
[13:32:33 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> good call
[13:33:12 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> happy to see the next evolution though... might even get tok it ourselves in the future
[13:33:14 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> maybe Tenant Manager also doesn't want to be a Portlet as such, and instead all of this wants to be script generation of entity files?
[13:33:42 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> open minded 
[13:34:29 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> my script for parsing entity files bit me in the rear, though, of course. It turns out, of course, that some entities have snuck into our portal live rather than through pure entity import. 
[13:34:55 CST(-0600)] <drewwills> heh, seems to happen
[14:20:31 CST(-0600)] <goldmantx1> @apetro_ have we decided to use Trello for next week and planning for Camp?
[16:34:39 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> @goldmantx1 not sure I get the reference to next week? As for Camp brainstorming / planning, I think it would work well and started Trello board for, but I hear from @JimHelwig that there's some interest in using other technologies. So it's fair to say both that consensus has not been reached and that I'll be more than happy to add anyone who would like added to the Trello board, which is configured so it is alrea
[16:34:39 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> dy publicly viewable.
[16:35:28 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> https://trello.com/b/E3iPiR7v/apereo-camp-2014
[16:39:10 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> so, anyone know if canDelete=false is supported on <channel /> DLM fragment layout elements?
[16:39:49 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> nevermind, found my bug. got lulled into using unremoveable instead :/
[17:18:48 CST(-0600)] <goldmantx> @apetro_ Thanks. That answers my question
[20:57:52 CST(-0600)] <apetro___> at long last, an un-favoriting pull request against the favorites feature branch, ready for code review and feedback: https://github.com/Jasig/uPortal/pull/203