Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

[15:28:26 CDT(-0500)] <athena> but i noticed that the fragment definiton has a different @blahblah in the name in the debugger

[15:37:01 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> hrm

[15:37:08 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that should be the object's identity hash code

[15:37:10 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> so if that changes

[15:37:13 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> it is a different object

[15:42:54 CDT(-0500)] <athena> yeah

[15:43:08 CDT(-0500)] <athena> but maybe spring web flow is copying it when it saves it to the scope?

[15:43:26 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> it would just grab a reference to it

[15:43:35 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the thing that scares me with those objects is they have behavior

[15:43:49 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> is it the root evaluator where the id changes

[15:43:52 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> or the list inside it

[15:44:03 CDT(-0500)] <athena> root

[15:44:16 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and both IDs are "new" on every request?

[15:44:21 CDT(-0500)] <athena> hmmm.

[15:44:29 CDT(-0500)] <athena> well, they're different between the dao response and what the JSP sees

[15:44:33 CDT(-0500)] <athena> haven't checked how they change over time

[15:44:43 CDT(-0500)] <athena> maybe really the best thing to do here is to have a helper that returns a custom object

[15:44:49 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> just wondering if webflow has something in like session scope

[15:44:50 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yeah

[15:44:58 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that would probably be faster

[15:45:01 CDT(-0500)] <athena> that way we can protect any sensitive weirdness in that class too

[15:45:11 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> yup

[15:45:18 CDT(-0500)] <athena> just expose some read-only data and let it be cleaner (smile)

[16:54:46 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> I really hate dates and times

[17:20:14 CDT(-0500)] <athena> no kidding.

[17:20:23 CDT(-0500)] <athena> amazing how painful that stuff can be

[17:20:33 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> though this appears to be a bug in our jodatime -> hibernate binding library

[17:20:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the code is for storing local dates

[17:20:48 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and since SQL doesn't understand TZs

[17:21:05 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> it does LocalDate -> Java Date in UTC

[17:21:11 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> but on the way back out that TZ coversion breaks

[17:21:19 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> so 2012-09-15 becomes 2012-09-14 when storing

[17:21:33 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> but 2012-09-14 doesn't go back to 2012-09-15 when reading