Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

[10:44:31 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> So now I have to watch on our improvment to make some PR (wink)

[10:47:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> tlev: when watching on PR i have again 2 PR in waiting UP-3760 - Adding portlet on locked tab/column and UP-3755 - Adding Portlet Parameter 'alternativeMaximixedLink' what is your feeling about to integrate it ? in my case it's in production on our 4.0.12 version

[10:48:43 CDT(-0500)] <tlev> I will try to look at these sometime this week

[10:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> ok thanks you

[10:51:18 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> Also we are working with esup about an alternative smartldapGroupStore using Grouper

[10:51:44 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> with grouper there is a tool to publish group in ldap

[10:51:55 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> and we are using this groupStore

[10:52:53 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> so this could be also a feedback

[10:53:21 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we have around 39k group maintained in memory from this group store

[10:54:24 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but we surely have to talk about some performance problems with portlets using the method isuserinRole that request massive groups

[10:55:30 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> the abstraction in uportal make too much request on groupStores and when you use massive group structure portlts are really slow to render

[10:56:09 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> but for this part we have to talk in ESUP group before to make you a feed back

[11:13:52 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> And the last thing that i forgot where on a strange system params

[11:14:08 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> we needed to reduce the size of the MTU

[11:14:46 CDT(-0500)] <jgribonvald> else some problems appear in email-preview and other problems where file upload is possible