...
The term open has become popularly used to describe a variety of objects (software and technology, educational resources, education, etc.). Ambiguity exists in the meaning of open, for example open education where anyone can enroll with the only requirement a fee, or open education that is available to anyone, and without a cost. In addition to the ambiguity of open (what it enables), there is also ambiguity with how organizations might operate to allow openness.
The Openness Maturity Model (OMM) Index attempts to define open attributes and a means to assess the type of openness within the community of practice responsible for the design, development, and distribution of the open artifact.
Importantly, the Openness Maturity Model Index is not designed to assess the "openness" of an artifact (object, software, OER, etc.) claimed to be open–there are plenty of licenses which can be used to assess the openness of an object–rather, the model assess the openness of the organization/community that creates and manages artifact.
...
There are five levels defined along the continuum of the a maturity model
- Initial (chaotic, ad hoc, individual heroics) - the starting point for use of a new or undocumented repeat process.
- Repeatable - the process is at least documented sufficiently such that repeating the same steps may be attempted.
- Defined - the process is defined/confirmed as a standard business process, and decomposed to levels 0, 1 and 2 (the latter being Work Instructions).
- Managed - the process is quantitatively managed in accordance with agreed-upon metrics.
- Optimizing - process management includes deliberate process optimization/improvement.
...
Info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
|
Potential Openness Key:
|
1. Process Categories
2. Processes
...
| |||||
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
| |
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
- The Artifacts Created During Participation in an Open Course
- Pedagogical Intent
- Learning Activities
- Assessments
- Assessment
- Externally Used Resources
- Credentialing (course and program level)
- Course Content
- Access Dimensions: non-discriminatory: open to everyone–non restrictive.
- Licensing Dimensions:
- Use
- Reuse
- Derivative Works
- Economic Access (open to everybody irrespective of their financial means)
- Learning Design
- Instruction and Support
- Delivery Technology
Resources Processes
Criteria | Definition | Metrics |
---|---|---|
- Open Access - publishing of research data
- Externally Used Resources
- Licensing Dimensions:
- Use
- Reuse
- Derivative Works
- Economic Access (open to everybody irrespective of their financial means)
- Software used
- Public Contribution
- Public comment
- Interoperability - resources are distributed with cross-platform interoperability in mind (for example RTF vs. PDF)
Processes
Resources | Processes surrounding the creation and maintenance of resources |
---|---|
R1. | |
R2. | |
R3. | |
R4. | |
R5. |
Support | Processes surrounding the oversight and management of community/institutional support |
---|---|
S1. | |
S2. | |
S3. | |
S4. | |
S5. |
Evaluation | Processes surrounding the evaluation and quality control |
---|---|
E1. | |
E2. | |
E3. | |
E4. | |
E5. |
Organization | Processes associated with institutional planning and management |
---|---|
O1. | |
O2. | |
O3. | |
O4. | |
O5. |
(perhaps the indicators below would be represented by individual items under each process category?)
Key Indicators | Brief Description |
---|---|
Values, Principles | courage, participation, honesty, maturity, humility, communication, transparency, self-organization, collaboration, evidence-based decision-making |
Objectives | simplicity, emergence |
Practices | incremental development, rapid feedback, continuous feedback |
Assessment Table
The "assessment table" becomes a matrix with each category of behavior assessed on a dimension:
- Delivery
- Planning
- Definition
- Management
- Optimization
So an evaluator/participant seeks evidence that the maturity element is being delivered, the evaluator seeks evidence of a planning process, evidence that the organization defines the element, manages it (including measurement), and has a process in which the element is assessed against standards and improved (reflective practice).
Each of these dimensions are then assessed in terms of openness. The dimensions and openness rating taken together forms a matrix. In the eMM model, adequacy is represented by color, making it pretty easy to identify in which areas on which dimensions the organizations exhibits various levels of maturity.
Process Dimensions
each process is examined based on dimensions of the process capability:
Delivery | Planning | Definition | Management | Optimization | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Process |
|
|
|
|
|
Openness Key:
...
...
...
...
...
Practices
...
L1 Practices
Delivery |
|
---|---|
Practice #1 is defined here. | |
| Fully Open - (definition of fully Open practice goes here) |
| Largely Open - (definition of largely Open practice goes here) |
| Partially Open - (definition of partially Open practice goes here) |
| Not Open - (definition of inOpen practice goes here) |
| Not assessed |
Practice 2 is defined here | |
| Fully Open - (definition of fully Open practice goes here) |
| Largely Open - (definition of largely Open practice goes here) |
| Partially Open - (definition of partially Open practice goes here) |
| Not Open - (definition of inOpen practice goes here) |
| Not assessed |
Practice 3 is defined here | and so on. |
Planning |
|
---|---|
Practice #1 is defined here. | |
| Fully Open - (definition of fully Open practice goes here) |
| Largely Open - (definition of largely Open practice goes here) |
| Partially Open - (definition of partially Open practice goes here) |
| Not Open - (definition of inOpen practice goes here) |
| Not assessed |
Practice 2 is defined here | |
| Fully Open - (definition of fully Open practice goes here) |
| Largely Open - (definition of largely Open practice goes here) |
| Partially Open - (definition of partially Open practice goes here) |
| Not Open - (definition of inOpen practice goes here) |
| Not assessed |
Practice 3 is defined here | and so on. |
References:
Masson, P. (2011) Open Governance in Higher Education: Extending the Past to the Future. Educause Review. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1112.pdf.
Marshall, S. (2007) eMM Version 2.3 Process Descriptions. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Available from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/Publications.shtml
Waugh P. & R. Metcalfe (2007) The Foundations of Openness. What are we doing today, brain? Available from http://pipka.org/blog/2008/07/23/the-foundations-of-openness/
...
| ||||||
|
|
References:
Masson, P. (2011) Open Governance in Higher Education: Extending the Past to the Future. Educause Review. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1112.pdf.
Marshall, S. (2007) eMM Version 2.3 Process Descriptions. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Available from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/Publications.shtml
Waugh P. & R. Metcalfe (2007) The Foundations of Openness. What are we doing today, brain? Available from http://pipka.org/blog/2008/07/23/the-foundations-of-openness/
Agile causality http://openmasters.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/causality.png?w=768&h=1024
Legacy Notes
- The Artifacts Created During Participation in an Open Course
- Pedagogical Intent
- Learning Activities
- Assessments
- Assessment
- Externally Used Resources
- Credentialing (course and program level)
- Course Content
- Access Dimensions: non-discriminatory: open to everyone–non restrictive.
- Licensing Dimensions:
- Use
- Reuse
- Derivative Works
- Economic Access (open to everybody irrespective of their financial means)
- Learning Design
- Instruction and Support
- Delivery Technology
Open Access - publishing of research data- Externally Used Resources
- Licensing Dimensions:
- Use
- Reuse
- Derivative Works
- Economic Access (open to everybody irrespective of their financial means)
- Software used
- Public Contribution
- Public comment
- Interoperability - resources are distributed with cross-platform interoperability in mind (for example RTF vs. PDF)
...