Page Comparison

[03:30:28 CST(-0600)] * edalquist (n=dalquist@76.210.71.51) has joined ##uportal
[03:48:25 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@76.210.71.51) has joined ##uportal
[09:19:10 CST(-0600)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[10:17:48 CST(-0600)] * peterk (n=Kharchen@24-181-226-126.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com) has joined ##uportal
[12:03:13 CST(-0600)] * dmccallum (n=dmccallu@uni1.unicon.net) has joined ##uportal
[16:32:29 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> anybody have a clear idea of how close to complete uP3 wsrp functionality is, if we ignore the issue of ORM technologies?
[16:32:43 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> that is, if we can live with JDO, can we consider WSRP more or less 'done'?
[16:32:57 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I knwo it "works" not sure what level of spec compliance there is though
[16:33:13 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> we can consume WSRP and produce published portlets as WSRP
[16:34:30 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> do you know if michael is still actively working on the dao layer, or plans to actively work on the dao layer in the next 2 1/2 weeks or so?
[16:35:09 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I very much doubt anything in the next few weeks
[16:35:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> and I don't get the feeling he'll be doing much more on it at all
[16:35:35 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> but I don't know for sure
[16:36:37 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> do you have a sense if what's in HEAD at this very moment is worth including in the december RC?
[16:36:47 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> for WSRP?
[16:36:50 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> yes
[16:36:50 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> yes I think it is
[16:37:01 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> there will likely need to be some documentation
[16:43:56 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> i guess what i'm after is this.... nobody here at unicon has looked at wsrp and we haven't had any plans to look at it, or to do any specific work on it. if it's perfectly fine as is, great. but i wanted to make sure we didn't let it slip through the cracks and miss inclusion in the RC if it's just on the verge of "working". do we need to try to drum up resources either here or in the community to take a look at this thing?
[16:44:53 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> it should probably get reviewed before going into the RC for at least basic functionality and documention on how to use it
[16:45:36 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> as for resources I need to check up with what I should be tackling and I'll be doing that with Charise tomorrow
[16:49:41 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> fair enough. i actually just walked over and talked with charise. sounds like we'll be able to devote some QA resources starting possibly tomorrow.
[16:50:05 CST(-0600)] <dmccallum> we're not signing up for full-blown QA on this thing, but they'll be able to kick the wsrp tires, as it were
[16:50:37 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> ok
[16:50:51 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> I think thats where I'm going to be spending most of the rest of my time before the conference too
[16:50:59 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> but more in a QA & fix role