Page Comparison

[04:01:04 EDT(-0400)] * mad (n=chatzill@pcit-8752.HIG.SE) has joined ##uportal
[04:05:29 EDT(-0400)] * dstn (n=dstn@schultz.its.yale.edu) has joined ##uportal
[09:45:36 EDT(-0400)] * michelled (n=team@142.150.154.197) has joined ##uportal
[09:59:42 EDT(-0400)] * colinclark (n=colin@142.150.154.101) has joined ##uportal
[10:18:20 EDT(-0400)] * MarkRogers (n=MarkRoge@wnpgmb0810w-ad08-122-99.dynamic.mts.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:18:54 EDT(-0400)] * apetro (n=apetro@ip68-3-58-144.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:28:50 EDT(-0400)] * lennard1 (n=sparhk@wsip-98-174-242-39.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[10:57:35 EDT(-0400)] * EricDalquist (n=dalquist@bohemia.doit.wisc.edu) has joined ##uportal
[11:55:24 EDT(-0400)] * apetro (n=apetro@ip68-3-58-144.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined ##uportal
[12:04:52 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> woohoo .... we're running up3 now
[12:24:59 EDT(-0400)] * colinclark (n=colin@142.150.154.101) has joined ##uportal
[12:30:01 EDT(-0400)] * apetro (n=apetro@12.164.139.7) has joined ##uportal
[12:46:01 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1>
[12:46:08 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> in prod?
[12:46:11 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> yup
[12:46:16 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> sweet
[12:46:34 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> a few minor hicups
[12:46:38 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> but never had to take an outage
[12:46:44 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> and now it is running very smoothly
[12:46:51 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> think pearson will likely be doing their move to uP3 in the summer of 09
[12:47:08 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> the portal 'feels' faster
[12:47:19 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> perception counts for a lot
[12:47:27 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> our average page render times are hovering around 750ms
[12:47:41 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> that's with about 300 active sessions on a machine
[12:47:56 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> subsecond will keep folks smiling
[12:48:34 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> first login times are the only perf issue I can see remaining. Unless you have already feexed that.
[12:48:56 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> nope
[12:48:59 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> that is still slow
[12:49:14 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> my guess is we're somewhere in the 1.5-2 second range there
[12:50:56 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> and looking at code I don't think that is really going to get fixed until RDBMUserStore and RDBMUserLayoutStore are re-written
[12:51:03 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> they are just not architected well
[13:00:18 EDT(-0400)] * lennard1 nods
[13:00:39 EDT(-0400)] <EricDalquist> lots of assumptions about single threaded use and such
[13:00:49 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> is still on pearson's radar, if it isn't fixed by the time we get to it... I'll get to take a shot at it.
[13:01:05 EDT(-0400)] <lennard1> yup
[13:05:06 EDT(-0400)] <dstn> EricDalquist, congrats