...
[09:26:25 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> the problem could be aggregation rate
[09:26:40 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> one thing I thought about is that I test this all on oracle
[09:26:50 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> which has different index behavior than some other DBs
[09:26:59 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> like FKs in oracle are indexes
[09:27:07 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> but in some other DBs explicit indexes are also needed
[09:27:21 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> that is why I'm interested in seeing a chunk from his 4.0.10 log
[09:27:30 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> to see if the aggr is running in catch up mode
[09:27:38 CST(-0600)] <EricDalquist> and if it is what the aggregation rate is