...
[15:50:15 CDT(-0500)] <jwennmacher> OK reread what you said. Yes I was planning on marking the dependency as provided
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> <dependency>
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> <groupId>org.apache.portals.pluto</groupId>
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> <artifactId>pluto-taglib</artifactId>
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> <version>2.1.0-M3</version>
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> <scope>provided</scope>
[15:50:39 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> </dependency>
[15:50:40 CDT(-0500)] <jwennmacher> So I assume I'm safe in the portlets with using the 2.1.0M3 version
[15:50:49 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> that is all you should add
[15:50:53 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> and it MUST be provided scope
[15:50:55 CDT(-0500)] <jwennmacher> Yep that's what I planned on doing
[15:50:59 CDT(-0500)] <jwennmacher> yes
[15:51:06 CDT(-0500)] <EricDalquist> the danger is if you include any pluto jars in your WAR file
[15:51:17 CDT(-0500)] <jwennmacher> agree